Primary energy use, per unit of GDP in Latvia
Latvia: Primary energy use, per unit of GDP was 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Primary energy use, per unit of GDP in Latvia, 1995–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for primary energy use, per unit of gdp in Latvia is 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 31 years on record.
That represents a change of down 10.0% on the previous year and down 54.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, primary energy use, per unit of gdp in Latvia peaked at 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places Latvia 170th out of 201 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Primary energy use, per unit of GDP in Latvia, year by year
| Year | terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 1997 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 1998 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1999 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 2000 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2001 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 2002 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2003 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 2004 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -12.4% |
| 2005 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 2006 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -18.8% |
| 2007 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -28.6% |
| 2008 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 2009 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | +25.6% |
| 2010 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | +19.8% |
| 2011 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -20.5% |
| 2012 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2013 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 2014 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2015 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | +18.8% |
| 2016 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2018 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 2019 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | +4.9% |
| 2020 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -12.4% |
| 2021 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2022 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2023 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 2024 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2025 | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 167 Guinea-Bissau 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP compare
- 168 Central African Republic 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP compare
- 169 Sweden 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP compare
- 171 Liberia 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP compare
- 172 Guyana 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP compare
- 173 Lithuania 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP compare
More energy & mining data for Latvia
- Fuel imports 10.6% (2025)
- Ores and metals imports 1.1% (2025)
- Ores and metals exports 1.6% (2025)
- Gas production 0 terawatt-hours (2024)
- Fossil fuel production per person, by fuel 0 kilowatt-hours per person (2024)
- Fossil fuel production by fuel 0 terawatt-hours (2024)
- Gas production per person 0 kilowatt-hours per person (2024)
- Fossil fuel production by fuel, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2024)
- Fossil fuel production by fuel, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Gas production, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is primary energy use, per unit of gdp in Latvia?
- Primary energy use, per unit of gdp in Latvia was 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest primary energy use, per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest primary energy use, per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Latvia rank for primary energy use, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 170th out of 201 countries with data for 2025.
- Is primary energy use, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 54.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Primary energy use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Primary energy use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Primary energy use ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Primary energy use Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Primary energy use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.