Kiribati vs Nauru: Annual change in primary energy use

Kiribati
0.0387 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Nauru
0.0416 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati rank
136th
Nauru rank
134th

Annual change in primary energy use over time

  • Kiribati
  • Nauru
-0.15-0.1-0.05-00.05198120022024

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.0416 terawatt-hours against 0.0387 terawatt-hours in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0029 terawatt-hours.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 136th and Nauru ranks 134th of 215 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Nauru Difference Ahead
1980s -0.0054 terawatt-hours -0.003 terawatt-hours 0.0025 terawatt-hours Nauru
1990s 0 terawatt-hours 0.0067 terawatt-hours 0.0067 terawatt-hours Nauru
2000s 0.0187 terawatt-hours -0.0401 terawatt-hours 0.0588 terawatt-hours Kiribati
2010s 0.0053 terawatt-hours 0.0094 terawatt-hours 0.004 terawatt-hours Nauru
2020s 0.0087 terawatt-hours 0.0129 terawatt-hours 0.0042 terawatt-hours Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, Kiribati or Nauru?
Nauru, at 0.0416 terawatt-hours against 0.0387 terawatt-hours in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use between Kiribati and Nauru?
0.0029 terawatt-hours, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for annual change in primary energy use?
Kiribati ranks 136th and Nauru ranks 134th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Nauru: Annual change in primary energy use. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/abs-change-energy-consumption/kiribati/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/abs-change-energy-consumption/kiribati/naoero/">Kiribati vs Nauru: Annual change in primary energy use</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
221 places, 10,501 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.