Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: Annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels

Hong Kong, China
1.23 terawatt-hours
in 2025
North Macedonia
0.7707 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
36th
North Macedonia rank
38th

Annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • North Macedonia
-100-50050199620102025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.23 terawatt-hours against 0.7707 terawatt-hours in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.4593 terawatt-hours.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.6 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 36th and North Macedonia ranks 38th of 76 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.96 terawatt-hours 0.5222 terawatt-hours 2.44 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2000s 12.02 terawatt-hours -0.0826 terawatt-hours 12.11 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2010s 3.48 terawatt-hours -0.0087 terawatt-hours 3.49 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2020s -12.08 terawatt-hours -0.43 terawatt-hours 11.65 terawatt-hours North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels, Hong Kong, China or North Macedonia?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.23 terawatt-hours against 0.7707 terawatt-hours in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels between Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
0.4593 terawatt-hours, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia rank globally for annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels?
Hong Kong, China ranks 36th and North Macedonia ranks 38th of 76 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: Annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-fossil-fuels/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-fossil-fuels/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/">Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: Annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy from fossil fuels
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
78 places, 3,835 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.