Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Bangladesh
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
39th
Sri Lanka rank
36th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sri Lanka
-00000.001196619942023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 39th and Sri Lanka ranks 36th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 39th and Sri Lanka ranks 36th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sri-lanka/">Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.