Brazil vs Iceland: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Brazil
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
91st
Iceland rank
88th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Iceland
-0000196619942023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Iceland ahead.

Brazil ranks 91st and Iceland ranks 88th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Brazil or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Brazil and Iceland?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iceland?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Iceland rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 91st and Iceland ranks 88th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Iceland: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iceland/">Brazil vs Iceland: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.