Central African Republic vs Greenland: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
121st
Greenland rank
122nd

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Greenland
-0000198120022023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.7 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 121st and Greenland ranks 122nd of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Greenland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Greenland Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Greenland
2000s -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Greenland?
Central African Republic, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Greenland?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Greenland?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Greenland rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 121st and Greenland ranks 122nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Greenland: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/">Central African Republic vs Greenland: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.