Costa Rica vs Faroe Islands: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
42nd
Faroe Islands rank
44th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Faroe Islands
00.0010.0010.002198120022023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 42nd and Faroe Islands ranks 44th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Faroe Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Faroe Islands?
Costa Rica, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Faroe Islands?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Faroe Islands?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Faroe Islands rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 42nd and Faroe Islands ranks 44th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Faroe Islands: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/faroe-islands/">Costa Rica vs Faroe Islands: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.