Ecuador vs North Korea: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
61st
North Korea rank
64th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • North Korea
-0.00100.0010.001196619942023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times North Korea's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was North Korea ahead.

Ecuador ranks 61st and North Korea ranks 64th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and North Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador North Korea Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Ecuador or North Korea?
Ecuador, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Ecuador and North Korea?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and North Korea?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and North Korea rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 61st and North Korea ranks 64th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs North Korea: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Ecuador vs North Korea: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.