Ecuador vs North Macedonia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
61st
North Macedonia rank
58th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • North Macedonia
-0000196619942023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 61st and North Macedonia ranks 58th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Ecuador or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Ecuador and North Macedonia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and North Macedonia rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 61st and North Macedonia ranks 58th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs North Macedonia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/north-macedonia/">Ecuador vs North Macedonia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.