Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
-0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
-0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
165th
Serbia rank
162nd

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
-0.001-0.00100.0010.001198120022023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 165th and Serbia ranks 162nd of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Serbia, at -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 165th and Serbia ranks 162nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.