Guinea-Bissau vs East Timor: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
-0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
-0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
139th
East Timor rank
136th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • East Timor
-0000198120022023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was East Timor ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 139th and East Timor ranks 136th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre East Timor
2010s -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or East Timor?
East Timor, at -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and East Timor?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and East Timor?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and East Timor rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 139th and East Timor ranks 136th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs East Timor: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/timor-leste/">Guinea-Bissau vs East Timor: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.