Honduras vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Honduras
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
51st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
48th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Honduras
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-0.00100.0010.0010.002198120022023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Honduras ranks 51st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 48th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Honduras or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Honduras and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Honduras ranks 51st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 48th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/honduras/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/honduras/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Honduras vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.