Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
0.0318 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.0075 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
2nd
Malta rank
4th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Malta
-0.1-0.0500.05196619942023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0318 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0075 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.0243 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 4.2 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 4th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Malta Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0075 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0068 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.0045 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0029 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.0115 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0075 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.0034 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0045 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta
2020s -0.0223 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0226 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Malta?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.0318 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0075 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Malta?
0.0243 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 4th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.