Kazakhstan vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Micronesia, Federated States of
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
93rd

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Micronesia, Federated States of
-0000.0010.001199120072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Micronesia, Federated States of's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 93rd of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Micronesia, Federated States of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Micronesia, Federated States of Difference Ahead
1990s -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Micronesia, Federated States of
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Micronesia, Federated States of
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Micronesia, Federated States of?
Kazakhstan, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Micronesia, Federated States of?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Micronesia, Federated States of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 93rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/micronesia-fed-sts/">Kazakhstan vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.