Kiribati vs Russia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Russia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
95th
Russia rank
94th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Russia
-0-0000198120022023

How they compare

Russia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 95th and Russia ranks 94th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Russia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Russia Difference Ahead
1990s -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Kiribati or Russia?
Russia, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Kiribati and Russia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Russia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Russia rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 95th and Russia ranks 94th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Russia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/russian-federation/">Kiribati vs Russia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.