Macau, China vs Singapore: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Macau, China
0.0226 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0754 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
3rd
Singapore rank
1st

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
-0.1-0.0500.050.1196619942023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0754 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0226 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Macau, China, a difference of 0.0528 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 3.3 times Macau, China's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Singapore ahead.

Macau, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 1st of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0123 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0194 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0071 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.0143 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0277 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0134 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0119 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0475 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0356 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.0128 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0355 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0228 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2020s -0.0081 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.0085 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Macau, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0754 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0226 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Macau, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Macau, China and Singapore?
0.0528 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 1st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.