Mauritius vs Naoero: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Mauritius
0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
15th
Naoero rank
14th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Naoero
-0.007-0.005-0.00300.003198120022023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Naoero ahead.

Mauritius ranks 15th and Naoero ranks 14th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Naoero in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Naoero Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Naoero
2000s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0024 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Naoero
2020s -0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Mauritius or Naoero?
Naoero, at 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Mauritius and Naoero?
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Naoero?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Naoero rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 15th and Naoero ranks 14th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Naoero: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/naoero/">Mauritius vs Naoero: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.