Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
-0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
150th
Zimbabwe rank
147th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
-00000198120022023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 147th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Papua New Guinea ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 147th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.