Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Sao Tome and Principe
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
38th
Sri Lanka rank
36th

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sri Lanka
-0-0-000196619942023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 38th and Sri Lanka ranks 36th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Sao Tome and Principe or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 38th and Sri Lanka ranks 36th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/sri-lanka/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.