Aruba vs Zimbabwe: Fossil fuel consumption by fuel
Aruba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Aruba rank
127th
Zimbabwe rank
127th
Fossil fuel consumption by fuel over time
- Aruba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 219 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel consumption by fuel, Aruba or Zimbabwe?
- Aruba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption by fuel between Aruba and Zimbabwe?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Zimbabwe?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil fuel consumption by fuel?
- Aruba ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026); Etemad & Luciani (1991) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel consumption by fuel. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.