Kiribati vs Montenegro: Fossil fuel consumption by fuel
Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Montenegro
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati rank
128th
Montenegro rank
128th
Fossil fuel consumption by fuel over time
- Kiribati
- Montenegro
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Montenegro, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 128th and Montenegro ranks 128th of 216 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel consumption by fuel, Kiribati or Montenegro?
- Kiribati, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption by fuel between Kiribati and Montenegro?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Montenegro rank globally for fossil fuel consumption by fuel?
- Kiribati ranks 128th and Montenegro ranks 128th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026); Etemad & Luciani (1991) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel consumption by fuel. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.