Slovenia vs Türkiye: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre

Slovenia
0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Türkiye
0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia rank
61st
Türkiye rank
62nd

Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Slovenia
  • Türkiye
00.0010.0020.003196519942023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Türkiye, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Slovenia ranks 61st and Türkiye ranks 62nd of 205 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Türkiye Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0026 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0018 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.0029 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.0026 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 0.0022 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre, Slovenia or Türkiye?
Slovenia, at 0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre between Slovenia and Türkiye?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Türkiye?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Slovenia and Türkiye rank globally for fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre?
Slovenia ranks 61st and Türkiye ranks 62nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Türkiye: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-consumption-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/turkiye/">Slovenia vs Türkiye: Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil fuel consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,414 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.