Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of
Afghanistan
0.2%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.1%
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
94th
Zimbabwe rank
97th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of over time
- Afghanistan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1% | 6.6% | 6.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of, Afghanistan or Zimbabwe?
- Afghanistan, at 0.2% against 0.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of between Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of?
- Afghanistan ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.