China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ecuador: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
0.0%
in 2024
Ecuador
1.7%
in 2024
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
33rd
Ecuador rank
34th

Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Ecuador
0246201020172024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.7% against 0.0% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 1.7%.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 42.5 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 33rd and Ecuador ranks 34th of 37 groups.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Ecuador Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0% 4.1% 4.1% Ecuador
2020s 0.1% 2.0% 1.9% Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 1.7% against 0.0% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ecuador?
1.7%, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ecuador?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Ecuador rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 33rd and Ecuador ranks 34th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ecuador: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-consumption-and-production-as-a-proportion-of-total-gdp-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-consumption-and-production-as-a-proportion-of-total-gdp-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/ecuador/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Ecuador: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
238 places, 3,361 data points, 2010–2026
Last refreshed