Congo vs Estonia: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of
Congo
0.1%
in 2024
Estonia
0.1%
in 2024
Congo rank
99th
Estonia rank
96th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of over time
- Congo
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Congo, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 99th and Estonia ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.8% | 0.3% | 2.5% | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of, Congo or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of between Congo and Estonia?
- 0.0%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of?
- Congo ranks 99th and Estonia ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.