Mali vs Sweden: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of
Mali
0.2%
in 2024
Sweden
0.2%
in 2024
Mali rank
88th
Sweden rank
90th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of over time
- Mali
- Sweden
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Sweden, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Mali ranks 88th and Sweden ranks 90th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Mali |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.1% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of, Mali or Sweden?
- Mali, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of between Mali and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sweden?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Sweden rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of?
- Mali ranks 88th and Sweden ranks 90th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.