Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)

Australia and New Zealand
8.26
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
8.82
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
25th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
25th

Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
0102030201020172024

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 8.82 against 8.26 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.56.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 25th of 201 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 6.83 9.9 3.07 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 7.81 14.25 6.45 Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 8.82 against 8.26 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
0.56, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-consumption-and-production-billions-of-nominal-united-states-dollars/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-consumption-and-production-billions-of-nominal-united-states-dollars/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
238 places, 3,358 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed