Australia and New Zealand vs Malaysia: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Australia and New Zealand
8.26
in 2024
Malaysia
8.28
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
25th
Malaysia rank
24th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 8.28 against 8.26 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Malaysia ranks 24th of 201 countries.
Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.83 | 3.59 | 3.24 | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 7.81 | 6.35 | 1.45 | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Australia and New Zealand or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 8.28 against 8.26 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Australia and New Zealand and Malaysia?
- 0.02, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Malaysia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Malaysia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Malaysia ranks 24th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.