Australia vs Turkmenistan: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Australia
8.17
in 2024
Turkmenistan
7.75
in 2024
Australia rank
26th
Turkmenistan rank
28th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Australia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 8.17 against 7.75 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.42.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Australia ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.79 | 5.78 | 1.01 | Australia |
| 2020s | 7.52 | 8.46 | 0.9415 | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Australia or Turkmenistan?
- Australia, at 8.17 against 7.75 in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Australia and Turkmenistan?
- 0.42, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Turkmenistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Turkmenistan rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Australia ranks 26th and Turkmenistan ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.