Belarus vs Chile: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Belarus
0.4104
in 2024
Chile
0.6123
in 2024
Belarus rank
72nd
Chile rank
70th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Belarus
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.6123 against 0.4104 in Belarus, a difference of 0.2019.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.5 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chile ahead.
Belarus ranks 72nd and Chile ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.397 | 0.7794 | 0.3824 | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.3174 | 1.21 | 0.896 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Belarus or Chile?
- Chile, at 0.6123 against 0.4104 in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Belarus and Chile?
- 0.2019, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Belarus ranks 72nd and Chile ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.