Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Belize
0.0024
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.0021
in 2024
Belize rank
133rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
135th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Belize
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Belize currently reports 0.0024 against 0.0021 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0003.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Belize ranks 133rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0177 | 0.0043 | 0.0134 | Belize |
| 2020s | 0.0018 | 0.0029 | 0.0012 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
- Belize, at 0.0024 against 0.0021 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0003, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Belize ranks 133rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.