Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malta: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0065
in 2024
Malta
0.0095
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
124th
Malta rank
121st
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0095 against 0.0065 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.003.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.5 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Malta ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th and Malta ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0039 | 0.0111 | 0.0073 | Malta |
| 2020s | 0.0166 | 0.0104 | 0.0063 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Malta?
- Malta, at 0.0095 against 0.0065 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malta?
- 0.003, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malta rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 124th and Malta ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.