China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Norway: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
0.0098
in 2024
Norway
5.15
in 2024
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
36th
Norway rank
36th

Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Norway
02.557.51012.5201020172024

How they compare

Norway currently reports 5.15 against 0.0098 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 5.14.

That makes Norway's figure about 523.7 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 36th and Norway ranks 36th of 37 groups.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Norway Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0044 9.42 9.42 Norway
2020s 0.0276 5.27 5.24 Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or Norway?
Norway, at 5.15 against 0.0098 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Norway?
5.14, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Norway?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Norway rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 36th and Norway ranks 36th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Norway: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-consumption-and-production-billions-of-nominal-united-states-dollars/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-consumption-and-production-billions-of-nominal-united-states-dollars/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/norway/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Norway: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
238 places, 3,358 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed