Congo vs Maldives: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Congo
0.0138
in 2024
Maldives
0.013
in 2024
Congo rank
114th
Maldives rank
115th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Congo
- Maldives
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0138 against 0.013 in Maldives, a difference of 0.0008.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 114th and Maldives ranks 115th of 201 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3444 | 0.0002 | 0.3442 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0175 | 0.0106 | 0.007 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Congo or Maldives?
- Congo, at 0.0138 against 0.013 in Maldives as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Congo and Maldives?
- 0.0008, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Maldives?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Maldives rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Congo ranks 114th and Maldives ranks 115th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.