Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Costa Rica
0.1808
in 2023
New Zealand
0.094
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
85th
New Zealand rank
87th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Costa Rica
- New Zealand
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.1808 against 0.094 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0868.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.9 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 85th and New Zealand ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1038 | 0.0662 | 0.0376 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.1127 | 0.3323 | 0.2196 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Costa Rica or New Zealand?
- Costa Rica, at 0.1808 against 0.094 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 0.0868, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Costa Rica ranks 85th and New Zealand ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.