Libya vs South Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Libya
7.27
in 2024
South Africa
7.7
in 2024
Libya rank
32nd
South Africa rank
29th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Libya
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 7.7 against 7.27 in Libya, a difference of 0.43.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 29th of 201 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.35 | 4.58 | 0.7662 | Libya |
| 2020s | 6.77 | 6.43 | 0.3436 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Libya or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 7.7 against 7.27 in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Libya and South Africa?
- 0.43, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Libya and South Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Libya ranks 32nd and South Africa ranks 29th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.