Malaysia vs Southern Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Malaysia
8.28
in 2024
Southern Africa
7.71
in 2024
Malaysia rank
24th
Southern Africa rank
27th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Malaysia
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 8.28 against 7.71 in Southern Africa, a difference of 0.57.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Southern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Southern Africa ahead.
Malaysia ranks 24th and Southern Africa ranks 27th of 201 countries.
Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.59 | 4.69 | 1.1 | Southern Africa |
| 2020s | 6.35 | 6.43 | 0.079 | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Malaysia or Southern Africa?
- Malaysia, at 8.28 against 7.71 in Southern Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Malaysia and Southern Africa?
- 0.57, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Southern Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Southern Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Malaysia ranks 24th and Southern Africa ranks 27th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.