Mali vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Mali
0.0458
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0531
in 2024
Mali rank
95th
Zimbabwe rank
92nd
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Mali
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0531 against 0.0458 in Mali, a difference of 0.0073.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mali ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0854 | 1.19 | 1.1 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0454 | 0.0265 | 0.019 | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Mali or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0531 against 0.0458 in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0073, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Mali ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.