Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Mauritius
0.0485
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0.0531
in 2024
Mauritius rank
94th
Zimbabwe rank
92nd
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Mauritius
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0531 against 0.0485 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0046.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mauritius ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0157 | 1.32 | 1.3 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0305 | 0.005 | 0.0255 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0531 against 0.0485 in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0046, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Mauritius ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.