Middle Africa vs Pakistan: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Middle Africa
3.33
in 2024
Pakistan
7.28
in 2024
Middle Africa rank
30th
Pakistan rank
31st
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Middle Africa
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 7.28 against 3.33 in Middle Africa, a difference of 3.95.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 2.2 times Middle Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Pakistan ahead.
Middle Africa ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 31st of 37 groups.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.45 | 6.21 | 3.76 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 3.95 | 10.39 | 6.44 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Middle Africa or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 7.28 against 3.33 in Middle Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Middle Africa and Pakistan?
- 3.95, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Pakistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Middle Africa and Pakistan rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Middle Africa ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 31st of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.