New Zealand vs Slovenia: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
New Zealand
0.094
in 2024
Slovenia
0.1805
in 2023
New Zealand rank
87th
Slovenia rank
86th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- New Zealand
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0.1805 against 0.094 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0865.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.9 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Slovenia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 86th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0553 | 0.1636 | 0.1083 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.3323 | 0.1517 | 0.1806 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), New Zealand or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0.1805 against 0.094 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 0.0865, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- New Zealand ranks 87th and Slovenia ranks 86th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.