Pakistan vs South Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Pakistan
7.28
in 2024
South Africa
7.7
in 2024
Pakistan rank
31st
South Africa rank
29th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Pakistan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 7.7 against 7.28 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.42.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 29th of 201 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.21 | 4.58 | 1.63 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 10.39 | 6.43 | 3.96 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Pakistan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 7.7 against 7.28 in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Pakistan and South Africa?
- 0.42, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and South Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Pakistan ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 29th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.