South Africa vs Turkmenistan: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
South Africa
7.7
in 2024
Turkmenistan
7.75
in 2024
South Africa rank
29th
Turkmenistan rank
28th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- South Africa
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 7.75 against 7.7 in South Africa, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
South Africa ranks 29th and Turkmenistan ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.58 | 5.78 | 1.2 | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 6.43 | 8.46 | 2.04 | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), South Africa or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 7.75 against 7.7 in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between South Africa and Turkmenistan?
- 0.05, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Turkmenistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do South Africa and Turkmenistan rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- South Africa ranks 29th and Turkmenistan ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.