Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)
Sub-Saharan Africa
15.93
in 2024
Uzbekistan
10.92
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
23rd
Uzbekistan rank
20th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 15.93 against 10.92 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 5.01.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 1.5 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 37 groups.
Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.17 | 9.15 | 6.03 | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 18.49 | 12.38 | 6.11 | Sub-Saharan Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production), Sub-Saharan Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Sub-Saharan Africa, at 15.93 against 10.92 in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) between Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 5.01, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.