Malta vs Namibia: Explicit fossil fuel subsidies as a share of GDP
Malta
0.0%
in 2020
Namibia
0.0%
in 2020
Malta rank
137th
Namibia rank
137th
Explicit fossil fuel subsidies as a share of GDP over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 137th of 187 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher explicit fossil fuel subsidies as a share of gdp, Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in explicit fossil fuel subsidies as a share of gdp between Malta and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for explicit fossil fuel subsidies as a share of gdp?
- Malta ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 137th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data from multiple sources compiled by the UN (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Explicit fossil fuel subsidies as a share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Subsidies are pre-tax and for both the production and consumption of fossil fuels. Production subsidies reduce the cost of producing coal, oil or gas. Consumption subsidies cut fuel prices for the end user, such as by fixing the price at the petrol pump so that it is less than the market rate.