Aruba vs Papua New Guinea: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Aruba
0 usd
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 usd
in 2024
Aruba rank
153rd
Papua New Guinea rank
153rd
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Aruba
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 usd against 0 usd in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 usd.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 153rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 194 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.012 usd | 0.554 usd | 0.542 usd | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 0 usd | 1.39 usd | 1.39 usd | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Aruba or Papua New Guinea?
- Aruba, at 0 usd against 0 usd in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Aruba and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 usd, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Papua New Guinea rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Aruba ranks 153rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).