Aruba vs East Timor: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Aruba
0 usd
in 2024
East Timor
0 usd
in 2024
Aruba rank
153rd
East Timor rank
153rd
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Aruba
- East Timor
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 usd against 0 usd in East Timor, a difference of 0 usd.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was East Timor ahead.
Aruba ranks 153rd and East Timor ranks 153rd of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.012 usd | 0.006 usd | 0.006 usd | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0 usd | 0.002 usd | 0.002 usd | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Aruba or East Timor?
- Aruba, at 0 usd against 0 usd in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Aruba and East Timor?
- 0 usd, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and East Timor rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Aruba ranks 153rd and East Timor ranks 153rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).