Belarus vs Costa Rica: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Belarus
45.31 usd
in 2024
Costa Rica
35.41 usd
in 2023
Belarus rank
64th
Costa Rica rank
67th
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 45.31 usd against 35.41 usd in Costa Rica, a difference of 9.9 usd.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 64th and Costa Rica ranks 67th of 194 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.91 usd | 16.47 usd | 25.44 usd | Belarus |
| 2020s | 31.96 usd | 22.19 usd | 9.77 usd | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Belarus, at 45.31 usd against 35.41 usd in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 9.9 usd, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Belarus ranks 64th and Costa Rica ranks 67th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).