Congo vs Namibia: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Congo
0 usd
in 2020
Namibia
0 usd
in 2020
Congo rank
147th
Namibia rank
147th
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Congo
- Namibia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 usd against 0 usd in Namibia, a difference of 0 usd.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 147th and Namibia ranks 147th of 186 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.5 usd | 21.38 usd | 49.11 usd | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 usd | 0 usd | 0 usd | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Congo or Namibia?
- Congo, at 0 usd against 0 usd in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Congo and Namibia?
- 0 usd, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Congo ranks 147th and Namibia ranks 147th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data from multiple sources compiled by the UN (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Subsidies are pre-tax and for both the production and consumption of fossil fuels. Production subsidies reduce the cost of producing coal, oil or gas. Consumption subsidies cut fuel prices for the final consumer, for example by fixing the price at the gas pump so that it is cheaper than the market rate. The data is expressed in US dollars, adjusted for inflation.