Equatorial Guinea vs Hong Kong, China: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita

Equatorial Guinea
1.09 usd
in 2024
Hong Kong, China
1.33 usd
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
120th
Hong Kong, China rank
118th

Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Hong Kong, China
02468201020172024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.33 usd against 1.09 usd in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.24 usd.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 120th and Hong Kong, China ranks 118th of 194 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2010s 3.15 usd 0.588 usd 2.56 usd Equatorial Guinea
2020s 1.61 usd 3.7 usd 2.09 usd Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.33 usd against 1.09 usd in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Hong Kong, China?
0.24 usd, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Hong Kong, China?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Hong Kong, China rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 120th and Hong Kong, China ranks 118th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Hong Kong, China: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid, drawing on International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund – with minor processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/fossil-fuel-subsidies-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/hong-kong-sar-china/">Equatorial Guinea vs Hong Kong, China: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Unit
usd
Source
International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
194 places, 2,690 data points, 2010–2024
Last refreshed

Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).